How scenario planning changed corporate strategy

HBR 2013-05In their recent article in the Harvard Business Review Angela Wilkinson and Roland Kupers take us on a enjoyable and educational time travel to the early days of corporate scenario planning.

Having both worked for Shell they share how the globally renowned scenario planning practice has been born out of the failure of financial prediction tools. They reflect on how future visioning has expanded and matured to become powerful narrative descriptions about “plausible stories” about how the “business context” of Shell might develop.

They also talk about cycles of popularity in which the scenario planning team experienced periods of great triumph and times where the possibility of being shut down was imminent.

For anyone who wants to build successful corporate foresight practices the article is a must read. Particularly the discussion how to (1) create value in a corporate organization and how to (2) develop a high connectedness in the organization by linking to expected units such as corporate strategy, innovation management, and risk management and less expected units such as public affairs and leadership development, is highly enlightening.

Title of article "Living in the Futures"They conclude with seven  golden rules for success that are not only relevant for scenario planning, of which at least six can be applied also to corporate foresight practices in general:

  • Make it plausible not probable
  • Strike a balance between relevant and challenging
  • Tell stories that are memorable yet disposable
  • Add numbers to narrative
  • Scenarios open doors
  • Manage disagreement as an asset
  • Fit into a broader strategic management system

To read the full article follow the following link: Wilkinson, A., & Kupers, R. 2013. Living in the Futures. Harvard Business Review, 91(5): 119-127.

 

Posted in Cases, Methods and tools, Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Collaborative Business Modeling for Systemic and Sustainability Innovations

In a recent article we discuss how the development of systemic innovations can be facilitated through collaborative business modeling (CBM). We argue that tackling the challenge to develop systemic innovation is particularly relevant for sustainability innovations.

We define such sustainability innovations as:

…inventions in technology, process or market that simultaneously create economic and societal value. Societal value can be differentiated in protecting the environment, ensuring economic growth and advancing social well-being. 

In the article we present a three-step approach on how to brainstorm, design and validate  business models in new innovation areas, see figure below.

Collaborative Business Modelling Process

 

The approach has been tested in a real-life situation within the field of smart energy. We conclude that CBM creates a powerful platform for jointly

  • identifying economic and societal value
  • defining value creation/value capture systems
  • planning of complex and uncertain future markets.

In the presentation below we show the approach step-by-step:

Fore more information you can also download a pre-print version here:

Rohrbeck, R., L. Konnertz and S. Knab 2013 Collaborative Business Modelling for Systemic and Sustainability Innovations, International Journal of Technology Management, forthcoming.

Posted in Cases, Methods and tools | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New evidence on the value contribution of corporate foresight

ElsevierIn a recent article we report on the results of a survey among 77 large multinational companies. We were interested to investigate which value firms get out of their corporate foresight activities.

We differentiated 13 items along four dimensions:

  • enhanced perception of emerging change and discontinuities
  • enhanced strategic management by for example fostering strategic discussion and creating the ability to adopt alternative perspectives
  • enhances innovation management by for example enhancing customer understanding and reducing the level of uncertainty in R&D projects
  • overall value contributions in terms of facilitating organizational learning and an improved ability to shape the future

Overall we find that firms generate significantly positive benefits from their corporate foresight activity. By matching the value creation date with firm performance we further reveal that top performing companies get considerably more value of their corporate foresight practices than their less performing peers (see figure 1).

Value creation from corporate foresight

Figure 1: Value created from corporate foresight activities, overview.

In the future we plan to investigate further which kind of corporate foresight activities contribute the different value creation categories.

For the detailed results and discussion of the finding you can download the full article at: Rohrbeck, R. and J. O. Schwarz 2013 The Value Contribution of Strategic Foresight: Insights from an Empirical Study on Large European Companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, forthcoming.

 

Posted in Theory | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Special issue on ICT tools for foresight

Many foresight activities are supported by information and communication technology (ICT) applications, for example:

  • Consulting firms offer trend databases
  • Foresight methods such as the Delphi technique are conducted via the Internet
  • Future-relevant data are identified through web-mining and data-mining
  • Methods for using ICT in creative group-decisions are being developed

In fact, foresight support systems (FSS) is an emerging research field. A new special issue project aims to unify previously scattered efforts of either conceptualizing or creating such support systems and tools into a coherent discussion and stream of literature. The issue will be edited by 5 guest editors for Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Submission deadline is 28th February 2013 – see the full call for papers for details.

Prospective authors are encouraged to contact the guest editors with enquires in relation to this special issue. “Since strategic foresight is often credited as a crucial antecedent for long-term success in companies, and up to now foresight processes have largely been project-based and individually implemented, it seems particularly promising to integrate methods of futures research in decision support systems.”, writes the editors.

Posted in Calls for papers | Leave a comment

Thanks to the Copenhagen PhD course participants – and we will welcome new ones next year!

This is a small report and thanks to the participants of the recent PhD course in “Strategic Foresight in Engineering” in Copenhagen. The course was held and organized by the DTU, took place from 17-21 September and involved 13 participants from 7 countries. We are happy to announce that there will be another seminar next year, most likely in Melbourne in December. This is also the planned location of the 2013 ISPIM symposium.

Thank you all for contributing to make the PhD course a success!

Posted in Communities, Education | Leave a comment